830 844
[15]
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, , et al. guidelines on prostate EAU, Part II: cancer. treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castra- tion-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2014;65:467–79.
[16]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.[17]
Tholomier C, Bienz M, Hueber PA, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes of 722 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) cases: The largest Canadian 5-year experience. Can Urol Assoc J 2014;8:195–201.
[18]
Novara G, Ficarra V. Advance sling in postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: more data available and some questions still open. Eur Urol 2012;62:146–7.
[19]
Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:418–30.
[20]
Kojima Y, Takahashi N, Haga N, et al. Urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and intra- operative techniques to improve surgical outcome. Int J Urol 2013;20:1052–63.
[21]
Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:179–92.
[22]
Tewari A, Jhaveri J, Rao S, et al. Total reconstruction of the vesico- urethral junction. BJU Int 2008;101:871–7.
[23]
Jeong CW, Lee JK, Oh JJ, et al. Effects of new 1-step posterior reconstruction method on recovery of continence after robot- assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, sin- gle-blind, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2015;193:935–42.[24]
Hurtes X, Roupreˆt M, Vaessen C, et al. Anterior suspension com- bined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparo- scopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. BJU Int 2012;110: 875–83.
[25]
Koliakos N, Mottrie A, Buffi N, De Naeyer G, Willemsen P, Fonteyne E. Posterior and anterior fixation of the urethra during robotic prostatectomy improves early continence rates. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2010;44:5–10.
[26]
Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, et al. Influence of modified posterior reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter on early recovery of continence and anastomotic leakage rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2011;59:72–80.[27]
Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2008;180:1018–23.[28]
Sutherland DE, Linder B, Guzman AM, et al. Posterior rhabdo- sphincter reconstruction during robotic assisted radical prostatec- tomy: results from a phase II randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2011;185:1262–7.[29]
Porena M, Mearini E, Mearini L, Vianello A, Giannantoni A. Voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy: more than external urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol 2007;52:38–45.
E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 8 2 2 – 8 3 0
830