Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  752 844 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 752 844 Next Page
Page Background

prospectively tracks clinical characteristics, treatment, relapse, survival,

and quality-of-life outcomes for men with PCa

[13]

. CaPSURE comprises

43 sites, including 36 community-based practices, three academic

centers, and four US Veterans Affairs medical centers. The study is

managed under institutional review board supervision, with all patients

providing informed consent for research.

Selected patients were diagnosed with nonmetastatic disease and

underwent initial primary management with RP, external beam

radiation therapy (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), primary androgen

deprivation (ADT), or active surveillance/watchful waiting (AS/WW).

We identified 14 862 men with PCa enrolled in the CaPSURE study

between 1995 and 2014. Of these, 410 patients (3%) were excluded

owing to positive lymph nodes, metastatic or clinical stage T4 disease at

enrollment; 1802 (12%) were excluded owing to primary treatment

outside of prespecified modalities, including 156 (1%) who had delayed

primary RP, 531 (3.6%) treated with cryotherapy, 331 (2.2%) who did not

receive treatment but were not classified as management with AS, and

783 (5.3%) who received other unspecified treatment or for whom

treatment data were incomplete. An additional 2121 men (14%) were

excluded because of incomplete data on initial biopsy Gleason score.

Thus, 10 529 patients were included in our analysis.

The primary outcome was risk of PCSM, and the primary indepen-

dent variable was the prognostic Gleason grade grouping system

proposed by the group from Johns Hopkins as presented at the

2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus

conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma

[5]

. PCSM was

defined as death as direct result of PCa. Development of bone metastasis

was defined by the presence of a positive bone scan, receipt of irradiation

to bone, or explicit identification by the provider in clinical staging.

Gleason grade categories at first positive biopsy and at RP were

evaluated as

<

3 + 4 = 7 (I); 3 + 4 (II); 4 + 3 (III); 4 + 4 (IV); or 9–10 (V).

Gleason scores 3 + 5 and 5 + 3 were included in category IV, consistent

with prior publications

[11]

. Other independent variables of interest

included age, race, clinical characteristics at diagnosis (year, prostate-

specific antigen [PSA], T stage), findings at surgical pathology (stage,

margin status), and disease risk as measured using the CAPRA (UCSF

Cancer of the Prostate Clinical Risk Assessment) score

[14]

. Modeling

was repeated in a secondary analysis in which we extended the Gleason

categories to 3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 4 + 4, 4 + 5, 5 + 4, and 5 + 5. Risk of bone

metastasis was regarded as a secondary endpoint and modeled similarly.

Independent and exposure variables were described using mean,

median, and frequency tables. Clinical and surgical pathology char-

acteristics were compared by Gleason grade category using analysis of

variance. The unadjusted risk of each outcome event was assessed using

Kaplan-Meier curves, and rates were compared by Gleason grade

category with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was

Table 2 – Results from a Cox proportional hazards model examining factors associated with risk of death from prostate cancer among men

in the CaPSURE study based on proposed prognostic Gleason grade groupings

Independent variable

Biopsy grade (all treatments)

Surgical grade (RP only)

p

value

HR (95% CI)

p

value

HR (95% CI)

Univariate model

Gleason grade

I (2–6) (reference)

<

0.01

1.00

<

0.01

1.00

II (3 + 4)

2.39 (1.86–3.06)

1.93 (1.17–3.17)

III (4 + 3)

2.96 (2.19–4.00)

2.65 (1.39–5.06)

IV (8)

6.98 (5.47–8.91)

6.12 (3.50–10.7)

V (9–10)

9.12 (6.90–12.0)

12.6 (7.56– 20.9)

Multivariate model

Gleason grade

I (2–6) (reference)

<

0.01

1.00

<

0.01

1.00

II (3 + 4)

1.92 (1.45–2.53)

1.91 (1.11–3.27)

III (4 + 3)

2.04 (1.45–2.85)

2.36 (1.17–4.77)

IV (8)

4.35 (3.29–5.75)

5.25 (2.87–9.62)

V (9–10)

5.15 (3.75–7.09)

9.46 (5.38–16.7)

Year of diagnosis

0.02

0.97 (0.95–1.00)

<

0.01

0.92 (0.88–0.98)

Age at diagnosis (per 10 yr)

0.55

0.96 (0.84–1.10)

0.30

1.18 (0.87–1.59)

Race

Other (reference)

<

0.01

1.00

0.07

1.00

African American

0.59 (0.39–0.90)

0.36 (0.09–1.37)

Caucasian

0.66 (0.52–0.84)

1.39 (0.69–2.79)

Log PSA at diagnosis

<

0.01

1.50 (1.35–1.67)

0.09

1.28 (0.97–1.70)

Clinical T stage

T1 (reference)

0.03

1.00

0.03

1.00

T2

1.26 (1.00–1.58)

1.60 (0.97–2.63)

T3/4

1.56 (1.10–2.21)

2.96 (1.31–6.68)

Primary treatment type

RP (reference)

<

0.01

1.00

Brachytherapy

1.40 (0.94–2.09)

External beam radiation

1.92 (1.45–2.55)

Hormonal therapy

2.58 (1.90–3.50)

AS/WW

2.45 (1.60–3.77)

Clinical site

Academic center

<

0.01

1.00

<

0.01

1.00

Community-based practice

2.65 (1.45–4.86)

2.00 (0.73–5.50)

Veterans Affairs center

2.13 (0.93–4.86)

11.6 (3.01–44.9)

x

2

likelihood ratio

530.3

136.5

RP = radical prostatectomy; HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; AS = active surveillance; WW = watchful waiting.

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 7 5 0 – 7 5 9

752