Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  E144 844 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page E144 844 Next Page
Page Background

[4]

Grummet JP, Weerakoon M, Huang S, et al. Sepsis and ‘‘superbugs’’: should we favor the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy? BJU Int 2014;114:384–8.

[5]

Roth H, Millar JL, Cheng AC, Byrne A, Evans S, Grummet J. The state of TRUS biopsy sepsis: readmissions to Victorian hospitals with TRUS biopsy-related infection over 5 years. BJU Int 2015;116(Suppl 3):49–53.

[6]

Pokorny MR, de Rooij M, Duncan E, et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by trans- rectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 2014;66:22–9.

Jeremy Grummet*

Lana Pepdjonovic

Daniel Moon

Australian Urology Associates, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

*Corresponding author. Australian Urology Associates, Monash

University, Surgery, 322 Glenferrie Road, Malvern, Victoria 3144,

Australia. Tel. +61 428888920.

E-mail address:

jpgrummet@hotmail.com

(J. Grummet).

October 9, 2016

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) e 1 4 3 – e 1 4 4

e144