Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  E141 844 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page E141 844 Next Page
Page Background

Letter to the Editor

Re: Jaimin R. Bhatt, Patrick O. Richard, Nicole S. Kim,

et al. Natural History of Renal Angiomyolipoma (AML):

Most Patients with Large AMLs >4 cm Can Be Offered

Active Surveillance as an Initial Management Strategy.

Eur Urol 2016;70:85–90

We read with great interest the article by Bhatt et al

[1]

. The

study included 447 patients with 582 tumors, with a

median follow-up period of 43.2 mo, to measure the natural

growth rates of renal angiomyolipoma (AML) using a

unique radiology data-mining system filtering a total of

2741 patients with probable renal AML. Bhatt and

colleagues

[1]

found that most sporadic AMLs are asymp-

tomatic and do not grow or grow slowly, regardless of the

initial size (

>

4 cm or 4 cm). Based on their experience the

authors suggest a policy of initial active surveillance for all

asymptomatic AMLs, even if they are

>

4 cm. The conclusion

may challenge the current management strategy of renal

AML

[2] .

We noticed that the vast majority of lesions were small,

with the median size being 1 cm; however, the size was

significantly larger for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).

The author stated that patients who underwent abdominal

imaging (computed tomography [CT] or ultrasound) were

included. However, even CT is not accurate for small AMLs,

especially for AMLs 1.3 cm

[3]

, which may lead to

measurement errors in the follow-up. Regarding the data

for the same patients who underwent the same abdominal

imaging each visit, the diameter of AML detected by CT or

ultrasound may be different even at the same follow-up

time. In addition, we want to know if there were any

patients detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),

or if the authors excluded the data regarding those who

underwent MRI. MRI is essentially equivalent in terms of

accuracy to CT in the diagnosis of AML and can be

particularly helpful in diagnosing fat poor AMLs

[4]

, and

is also widely used for the diagnosis of AML in clinical

settings.

We definitely agree with the opinion of Ribal

[2]

that we

should completely differentially consider AMLs associated

with TSC and sporadic forms. The author showed that about

3.8% of patients were proven to be TSC, which is lower than

a previous study

[5]

, and may be due to the fact that up to

25% of TSC cases may not currently be identifiable with

conventional genetic screening test and also the number

and proportion of patients who underwent genetic screen-

ing tests. In the study, there were two patients with

metastatic epithelioid AML who were treated with mecha-

nistic target of rapamycin inhibitors, which attracted our

interest. Were the two cases of AML both associated with

TSC? In our institution, we performed a phase 2 study

(18 patients) to investigate the efficacy and safety of

everolimus for renal AML associated with TSC in Chinese

patients

[6] .

One case in our institution received oral

everolimus 10 mg/d; the volume of the target lesion

reduced by about 60% at 6 mo compared with baseline.

However, the volume of the target lesion increased about

25% at 12 mo compared with baseline. The patient then

underwent left nephrectomy and an immunohistochemical

examination revealed features of epithelioid AML accom-

panied by retroperitoneal multiple lymph node metastasis.

For epithelioid AML, even in TSC patients, we should

consider surgical intervention instead of mechanistic target

of rapamycin inhibitors.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments:

Funding for this study was provided by the National

Natural Science Foundation of China (81670611).

References

[1]

Bhatt JR, Richard PO, Kim NS, et al. Natural history of renal angio- myolipoma (AML): most patients with large AMLs > 4 c m can be offered active surveillance as an initial management strategy. Eur Urol 2016;70:85–90

.

[2]

Ribal MJ. Challenging already established statements on the thera- py of renal angiomiolypoma. Eur Urol 2016;70:91–2

.

[3]

Davenport MS, Neville AM, Ellis JH, Cohan RH, Chaudhry HS, Leder RA. Diagnosis of renal angiomyolipoma with hounsfield unit thresholds: effect of size of region of interest and nephrographic phase imaging. Radiology 2011;260:158–65

.

[4]

Kim JK, Kim SH, Jang YJ, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from other neoplasms at double-echo chemical shift FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239:174–80

.

[5]

Nelson CP, Sanda MG. Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma. J Urol 2002;168:1315–25

.

[6]

Cai Y, Li H, Zhang Y. Mp03-06 preliminary analysis the efficacy and safety of everolimus for renal angiomyolipoma associated tuberous E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) e 1 4 1 – e 1 4 2

ava ilable at

www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage:

www.eu ropeanurology.com

DOI of original article:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.048

.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.014

0302-2838/

#

2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.