Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  801 844 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 801 844 Next Page
Page Background

and disadvantages associated with the surgical techniques

available.

3.3.2.1. TUR surgery.

TUR has been proposed for the treatment

of BE even though evidence supporting the efficacy and

safety of this procedure is poor

( Table 5 ) [108–110] .

In fact,

this surgical technique does not properly apply to treatment

of this type of lesion from a pathogenic point of view

[77]

. Since the nodule develops from the outer layer of the

bladder wall towards the inner layer, complete excision of

the endometriotic lesion is virtually unachievable, exposing

the patient to a high risk of bladder perforation and short-

term recurrence of both symptoms and disease

[107–110] .

Therefore, on the basis of the evidence available, TUR should

not be performed for the treatment of BE.

3.3.2.2. Segmental bladder resection.

Partial cystectomy is a

bladder-preserving operation for the treatment of BE that

can be performed via laparotomy

[107,108,111–114]

or

laparoscopy

[102–109,111–124]

without or with robotic

assistance

( Table 5 ) [125–130]

. This procedure consists of

partial bladder resection for detrusor endometriosis with or

without preventive cystoscopic catheterization of the

ureters. Ureteral cannulation is optional in the case of

surgery for primary BE nodules, which are usually located

on the posterior bladder wall, well above the trigonal area.

The decision to perform ureteral cannulation is mainly

based on the surgeon’s preference and on the distance

between the caudal margin of the endometriotic lesion and

the interureteric ridge (advisable if

<

2 cm). Conversely,

preventive catheterization is mandatory when treating

recurrent nodules, which may infiltrate down the bladder,

approaching the ureteral meatuses

[131]

. Partial cystec-

tomy is generally a safe and simple procedure: the bladder

contents are sterile, vesical sutures heal easily because of

rich vascularization, and prolonged urine drainage ( 10 d)

usually prevents fistula formation

[77]

. Several studies have

shown that partial cystectomy is an effective technique

with excellent long-term results in terms of symptom relief

and recurrence

[104,105,107,113,114] .

As mentioned earli-

er, complete removal of the lesion is a mandatory aim of the

surgical procedure. Fedele et al

[107]

reported long-term

outcomes for surgical conservative treatment of BE. Thirty-

three patients with BE of the base were included: one group

(

n

= 19) underwent partial cystectomy only, while the

second group (

n

= 14) underwent partial cystectomy plus a

0.5- to 1-cm-deep myometrial resection of the anterior

uterine wall adjacent to the vesical nodule to remove any

adenomyotic focus lying under the vesical lesion. Symptom

recurrence was significantly more frequent among women

in the first group (36.8%) than those in the second group

(7.1%). The type of surgery was the only prognostic factor

associated with a higher risk of BE relapse, and no

significant association was observed for age, previous

surgery for endometriosis, parity, and pregnancy after

operation

[107]

.

3.3.2.3. Combined cystoscopic and open/laparoscopic/robotic

approach.

Different authors have described a combination

of TUR and open/laparoscopic/robotic surgery for BE

[109,132–137]

. The aim of this double approach is to

overcome the limitations of both surgical techniques

( Table 5

). Open/laparoscopic/robotic excision of endome-

triotic nodules of the bladder may lead to inadvertent

removal of healthy bladder muscle, in particular in the case

of large endometriotic lesions. Hence, this surgical approach

alone increases the risk of postoperative complications and

symptoms due to small bladder volume. Conversely, if

nodule resection is performed only by TUR, the risks of

incomplete removal, of intraoperative bladder perforation

(when attempting to achieve complete nodule removal),

and of relapse are high. Thus, a combination of TUR and

open/laparoscopic/robotic surgery allows complete remov-

al of the endometriotic nodule while sparing most of the

healthy bladder tissue. However, evidence on this topic is

scanty and limited to case reports and case series. In fact,

well-designed (ideally randomized) studies would be very

difficult to perform given the relative rarity of BE and the

high number of patients to be included in a randomized trial

comparing an experimental with the standard procedure.

3.4.

Management of BE in patients wishing to conceive

As mentioned earlier, BE is rarely an isolated condition. In

nine out of ten cases, other forms of endometriosis are

concomitant

[7]

. In practice, disentanglement of the

independent effect of BE on fertility is challenging, if not

impossible. Similarly, evaluation of the benefits of surgical

excision is demanding because surgery for BE is generally

concomitant with treatment for other forms of the disease,

such as adhesions, endometriomas, superficial implants,

and other deep localizations of the disease. It is noteworthy

that there is no strong rationale for hypothesizing a

detrimental impact of BE per se on fertility. Similar to

other deep locations, bladder lesions are buried under

adhesions and the associated inflammation is not expected

to perturb the pelvic milieu. In fact, an independent

detrimental effect of deep invasive endometriotic perito-

neal lesions on fertility has never been demonstrated and

remains debated

[138]

. Moreover, pelvic steps of the

conception process (ovulation, oocyte pick-up by the tubes,

fertilization, and tubal transport) occur in the posterior

pelvis, and are thus distant from the bladder and BE.

However, deep peritoneal endometriosis is associated with

adenomyosis

[139,140] ,

a condition characterized by

infiltration of the endometrium into the adjacent myome-

trium. Infertility in women with BE may actually be

mediated by this association, considering in particular that

adenomyosismay interferewith fertility

[141,142] .

Specific

data on fertility treatment in women with BE are extremely

scanty and controversial. We identified only two case

series specifically reporting on pregnancy rates following

surgery for BE

[106,121]

and failed to identify any data on

in vitro fertilization (IVF). Specifically, Kovoor et al

[12]

reported that five out of ten (50%) infertile women with BE

conceived naturally after the intervention. Soriano et al

[106]

observed 16 natural pregnancies out of 42 women

(38%) seeking pregnancy after the intervention. Data on

E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 7 1 ( 2 0 1 7 ) 7 9 0 – 8 0 7

801